Significant Costs Unnecessary and Confusing Case Name Abbreviations For legal professionals committed to Bluebook compliance, as well as the research services and citation software tools upon which they rely, the change raises confounding issues. For users the merger achieves only a slight reduction in the book’s heft-two pages, plus or minus. Any additional gains for a novice user of the reference, one of those beginning law students, say, are less clear. It is the sort of change that will, inevitably, undercut the market for second-hand copies of The Bluebook‘s prior edition among the nation’s annual 38,000 or so beginning law students. Modest Gainsįor the sponsoring organizations this constitutes the type of periodic revision valued by all publishers of higher education texts. The new, consolidated, T6 applies to case names, and to the names of publications, as well. In this latest edition, The Bluebook has collapsed the two. & Org.” A writer consulted Table T6, not T13.2, when abbreviating a word in a case name or in the name of an institutional author. Rev.”, “Yale Law Journal” into “Yale L.J.”, and “Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization” into “J.L. Its columns, together with the institutional abbreviations contained in Table T13.1, turned “Harvard Law Review” into “Harv. That table, Table T13.2, was a single purpose reference, to be used solely when citing articles. The twenty-first edition of The Bluebook has eliminated the separate table that previously prescribed how to abbreviate common words appearing in the name of a cited publication.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |